Kant's third Critique analyzing the faculty of judgment — both aesthetic (the beautiful, the sublime) and teleological (organisms as purposive) — as the bridge between the theoretical and practical realms.
Aesthetic judgment makes a subjective universal claim: the beautiful pleases without concept or interest and yet demands universal assent. The sublime involves a supersensible dimension that points beyond nature. Teleological judgment treats organisms as if they have purposes without asserting genuine purposiveness in nature.
No conceptual lineage found.
No recorded contemporaries.
No recorded minds influenced.
No conceptual posterity found.
Discussing
Ask anything about Critique of the Power of Judgment — their ideas, influences, contradictions, legacy.
Sign in to start a conversation.