The philosophical and social movement holding that one should use evidence and reasoning to determine how to do the most good — treating all lives as equally valuable and directing resources toward the highest-impact interventions.
Impartial beneficence: the interests of all people (and animals) count equally regardless of proximity. Evidence-based charity: some interventions save lives at $1,000–$5,000 per life (e.g., malaria nets); others spend orders of magnitude more per QALY. Earning to give: some people can do more good by earning wealth and donating than by working directly in nonprofits. Later: existential risk and longtermism as the highest-impact cause areas. One of the most influential new ethical movements of the 21st century.
Discussing
Ask anything about Effective Altruism — their ideas, influences, contradictions, legacy.
Sign in to start a conversation.