Dworkin's most systematic work in legal philosophy — presenting law as an 'interpretive' practice and arguing that judges should approach hard cases through the ideal of 'law as integrity.'
Law as integrity: judges should treat the law as if it were authored by a single coherent moral agent — finding the interpretation that best fits and justifies the legal practice as a whole. Hercules: the ideal judge with unlimited time and knowledge — a heuristic for understanding what judicial reasoning aspires to. Interpretivism vs. conventionalism vs. pragmatism: three rival theories of law assessed and rejected in favor of integrity.
Discussing
Ask anything about Law's Empire — their ideas, influences, contradictions, legacy.
Sign in to start a conversation.