PANTHEON
ExploreBuild My Library
© 2026 Pantheon — an atlas of the ideas that shaped how we think.
concept1957-present

Many Worlds Interpretation

Disciplines:
physics
philosophy of science/philosophy of physics

Summary

Hugh Everett's interpretation of quantum mechanics in which the wave function never collapses — instead, at each 'measurement' the universe branches into multiple worlds, each realizing one possible outcome.

Core Contribution

Against the Copenhagen collapse: the orthodox Copenhagen interpretation holds that the wave function 'collapses' to a definite state on measurement. Everett's relative state formulation (1957): the wave function never collapses; the observer becomes entangled with the measured system and all branches are equally real. Each quantum measurement branches the universe; 'we' are in all branches, unaware of the others. Implications: the quantum multiverse; probability as branch measure; no preferred observer. Endorsed by Deutsch, DeWitt, and many physicists.

Key Spikes & Highlights

  • Everett's interpretation was rejected by Bohr and dismissed by the physics establishment after his 1957 thesis. He left physics for defense work. The interpretation was later revived by DeWitt and became one of the most popular among physicists.

Historical Influences

John Wheeler Copenhagen Interpretation

Intellectual Lineage

Quantum Mechanics Philosophy of Physics

Allied Works

The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum MechanicsThe Fabric of Reality Something Deeply Hidden

Contemporaries & Peers

Copenhagen Interpretation Pilot Wave Theory

Minds Influenced

Multiverse TheoryPhilosophy of Physics AI

Intellectual Posterity

Quantum Multiverse TheoryPhilosophy of Physics Quantum Computing

Discussing

Many Worlds Interpretation

Ask anything about Many Worlds Interpretation — their ideas, influences, contradictions, legacy.

Sign in to start a conversation.