Weekly panel debate on the ethical dimensions of current events—four commentators interrogate expert witnesses and each other with rigour, interruption, and genuine disagreement.
Models genuine adversarial ethical debate in public; shows that moral disagreement is often structural, not merely factual; keeps applied ethics in popular discourse.
No conceptual lineage found.
Discussing
Ask anything about Moral Maze — their ideas, influences, contradictions, legacy.
Sign in to start a conversation.