American epistemologist who has contributed to debates about epistemic peer disagreement and the nature of evidence.
Total evidence view on peer disagreement: when you disagree with an epistemic peer, you should weigh their opinion as additional evidence — but what weight depends on your total evidence including your first-order reasons. Argued against conciliationism's requirement to always split the difference.
No recorded minds influenced.
Discussing
Ask anything about Thomas Kelly — their ideas, influences, contradictions, legacy.
Sign in to start a conversation.